Saturday, 7
October 2006
ITP Business
Weapons of mass
construction
by
Sean Cronin
For anyone wanting an
insight into how reconstruction dollars
are spent in Iraq, the recently
published report from the Office of the
Special Inspector General for Iraq
Reconstruction, is a must-read.
It details what inspectors found at the
US $75 million (IQD109.8 billion)
Baghdad Police College, built by Parsons
Corporation, when they visited it last
month.
Most of the problems identified by
inspectors related to the plumbing in
the college, which was so bad that the
effluent spilling out of it actually
threatened the structural integrity of
the building.
Rather than using standard t-joint
fittings to connect pipes, like any
16-year-old on a plumbing trainee scheme
would have done, the cowboys on this
project instead cut out holes by hand,
jammed the connecting pipes in and hoped
for the best.
If that wasn’t bad enough, not one of
the wastewater pipes was sealed, or even
firmly attached – so the waste simply
drained outside of the collectors rather
than inside, accumulating between floors
and gradually filling up every void.
The report states: “The amount of
[waste] material was so pervasive that
it had soaked through the reinforced
concrete floors causing deterioration of
the reinforcing steel.
“We witnessed a light fixture so full of
diluted urine and faeces that it would
not operate. As we continued our
assessment throughout the second-floor
bathroom, we identified evidence of
large quantities of diluted urine
dripping from the top floor down through
the ceiling. During our visit, a
substance dripped from the ceiling onto
an assessment team member’s shirt.”
The report hilariously includes pictures
of the inspector’s shirt cuffs, together
with another picture pointing to the
dripping ceiling where the foul-smelling
liquid emanated from.
Who would have thought that the quest
for evidence of weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq would have found so
much of it dripping from the ceilings of
the newly built Baghdad Police College?
I do hope the inspector can claim
dry-cleaning on expenses. If not,
perhaps Parsons might be prepared to
foot the bill out of the $1 billion it
has earned on ‘reconstruction’ projects
like this one.
|